Съдържанието можете да изтеглите оттук.
Отговорни редактори на броя: Александра Багашева и Венсан Ренер
Съдържанието можете да изтеглите оттук.
Отговорни редактори на броя: Александра Багашева и Венсан Ренер
Съдържанието можете да свалите оттук.
Съдържанието можете да изтеглите оттук.
Съдържанието можете да свалите оттук.
Съдържанието можете да свалите оттук.
Съдържанието можете да изтеглите оттук.
Съдържанието можете да свалите оттук.
Съдържанието и резюметата на статиите можете да изтеглите оттук.
Summary/Abstract: The paper deals with the usage of possessive verbs as auxiliaries or with the function of modal verbs in some Slavic languages. Such usages are typical not only of the Slavic verb имэти ‘have’, but also of дати_‘give’ and вьзенти_‘take’. The need to analyse the semantic development of the possessive verbs in a historical and synchronic aspect is stressed.
Keywords: semantics; pragmatics; knowledge; definition of “say that”; say that vs. say:_.; quotative; rhetic/phatic; functor; propositional function;
Summary/Abstract: In the article a definition of ‘say that’ (with propositional complements) is offered and substantiated. The definition, which is far from being simple, is based, crucially, on the four concepts deemed primitive: ‘know that’, ‘do’, ‘someone’, ‘something’. The English expression say that is taken to be simple in the sense of its indivisibility into say and that as bearers of separate semantic values and to be universal in the sense of its having an exact semantic counterpart in every language; certain other expressions (in English as well as in other languages) are just variants of say that without any independent strictly semantic load (cf., e.g., He said she’s ill. – without that). On the other hand, the author claims that there is an independent unit of language in the form of the quotative say: _. The string say as such is assigned the status of a sheer morphological form rather than that of a genuine unit of language. An attempt is being made to show that none of the two units of language is derivable from the other one in terms of a viable operation (acting as a self-contained linguistic item).
Summary/Abstract: This article presents some of the features of the contrastive approach in the study of terms. The following main problems of contrastive investigations in terminology are discussed: tertium comparationis; common aim and specific purposes; scope of topic and methodological varieties; relationships with some other approaches.
Summary/Abstract: This paper offers a unified account of the phonological aspects of morpholexical and morphosyntactic processes such as compounding, affixation and cliticisation which often lead to mismatches between morphological and prosodic constituency. In the Prosodic phonology framework these three processes can be illustrated by three possible operations according to the nature and the combinatorial proprieties of the morphemes in the language under consideration, but also according to the degree of cohesion between stems, bound roots, affixes and clitics: splitting in two phonological words, adjunction or incorporation in the phonological word. This claim is supported and illustrated by data from English, Classical Latin, Italian, Neapolitan, Modern Greek, Dutch, Japanese, Ossetic and Southern Paiute.
Summary/Abstract: The process of the rapid proliferation of various terminological systems during the past decades creates the need of developing a theory of terminological systems as one of the ways of bringing order into this process. The article examines some basic concepts and principles of such a theory with a view to developing a methodology of constructing such systems. Four groups of problems are discussed: the essential characteristics of terminological systems and their description, their elements and their interrelationship and the methodology of linguistic construction of such systems. Introduced are the concepts of the pair “term-definition“ as an element of the terminological system, transformed definition and taxonomic network ordered graph of the structure of the terminological system.
Summary/Abstract: The paper deals with the usage of possessive verbs as auxiliaries or with the function of modal verbs in some Slavic languages. Such usages are typical not only of the Slavic verb имэти ‘have’, but also of дати_‘give’ and вьзенти_‘take’. The need to analyse the semantic development of the possessive verbs in a historical and synchronic aspect is stressed.
Keywords: semantics; pragmatics; knowledge; definition of “say that”; say that vs. say:_.; quotative; rhetic/phatic; functor; propositional function;
Summary/Abstract: In the article a definition of ‘say that’ (with propositional complements) is offered and substantiated. The definition, which is far from being simple, is based, crucially, on the four concepts deemed primitive: ‘know that’, ‘do’, ‘someone’, ‘something’. The English expression say that is taken to be simple in the sense of its indivisibility into say and that as bearers of separate semantic values and to be universal in the sense of its having an exact semantic counterpart in every language; certain other expressions (in English as well as in other languages) are just variants of say that without any independent strictly semantic load (cf., e.g., He said she’s ill. – without that). On the other hand, the author claims that there is an independent unit of language in the form of the quotative say: _. The string say as such is assigned the status of a sheer morphological form rather than that of a genuine unit of language. An attempt is being made to show that none of the two units of language is derivable from the other one in terms of a viable operation (acting as a self-contained linguistic item).
Summary/Abstract: This article presents some of the features of the contrastive approach in the study of terms. The following main problems of contrastive investigations in terminology are discussed: tertium comparationis; common aim and specific purposes; scope of topic and methodological varieties; relationships with some other approaches.
Summary/Abstract: This paper offers a unified account of the phonological aspects of morpholexical and morphosyntactic processes such as compounding, affixation and cliticisation which often lead to mismatches between morphological and prosodic constituency. In the Prosodic phonology framework these three processes can be illustrated by three possible operations according to the nature and the combinatorial proprieties of the morphemes in the language under consideration, but also according to the degree of cohesion between stems, bound roots, affixes and clitics: splitting in two phonological words, adjunction or incorporation in the phonological word. This claim is supported and illustrated by data from English, Classical Latin, Italian, Neapolitan, Modern Greek, Dutch, Japanese, Ossetic and Southern Paiute.
Summary/Abstract: The process of the rapid proliferation of various terminological systems during the past decades creates the need of developing a theory of terminological systems as one of the ways of bringing order into this process. The article examines some basic concepts and principles of such a theory with a view to developing a methodology of constructing such systems. Four groups of problems are discussed: the essential characteristics of terminological systems and their description, their elements and their interrelationship and the methodology of linguistic construction of such systems. Introduced are the concepts of the pair “term-definition“ as an element of the terminological system, transformed definition and taxonomic network ordered graph of the structure of the terminological system.
Summary/Abstract: The paper deals with the usage of possessive verbs as auxiliaries or with the function of modal verbs in some Slavic languages. Such usages are typical not only of the Slavic verb имэти ‘have’, but also of дати_‘give’ and вьзенти_‘take’. The need to analyse the semantic development of the possessive verbs in a historical and synchronic aspect is stressed.
Keywords: semantics; pragmatics; knowledge; definition of “say that”; say that vs. say:_.; quotative; rhetic/phatic; functor; propositional function;
Summary/Abstract: In the article a definition of ‘say that’ (with propositional complements) is offered and substantiated. The definition, which is far from being simple, is based, crucially, on the four concepts deemed primitive: ‘know that’, ‘do’, ‘someone’, ‘something’. The English expression say that is taken to be simple in the sense of its indivisibility into say and that as bearers of separate semantic values and to be universal in the sense of its having an exact semantic counterpart in every language; certain other expressions (in English as well as in other languages) are just variants of say that without any independent strictly semantic load (cf., e.g., He said she’s ill. – without that). On the other hand, the author claims that there is an independent unit of language in the form of the quotative say: _. The string say as such is assigned the status of a sheer morphological form rather than that of a genuine unit of language. An attempt is being made to show that none of the two units of language is derivable from the other one in terms of a viable operation (acting as a self-contained linguistic item).
Summary/Abstract: This article presents some of the features of the contrastive approach in the study of terms. The following main problems of contrastive investigations in terminology are discussed: tertium comparationis; common aim and specific purposes; scope of topic and methodological varieties; relationships with some other approaches.
Summary/Abstract: This paper offers a unified account of the phonological aspects of morpholexical and morphosyntactic processes such as compounding, affixation and cliticisation which often lead to mismatches between morphological and prosodic constituency. In the Prosodic phonology framework these three processes can be illustrated by three possible operations according to the nature and the combinatorial proprieties of the morphemes in the language under consideration, but also according to the degree of cohesion between stems, bound roots, affixes and clitics: splitting in two phonological words, adjunction or incorporation in the phonological word. This claim is supported and illustrated by data from English, Classical Latin, Italian, Neapolitan, Modern Greek, Dutch, Japanese, Ossetic and Southern Paiute.
Summary/Abstract: The process of the rapid proliferation of various terminological systems during the past decades creates the need of developing a theory of terminological systems as one of the ways of bringing order into this process. The article examines some basic concepts and principles of such a theory with a view to developing a methodology of constructing such systems. Four groups of problems are discussed: the essential characteristics of terminological systems and their description, their elements and their interrelationship and the methodology of linguistic construction of such systems. Introduced are the concepts of the pair “term-definition“ as an element of the terminological system, transformed definition and taxonomic network ordered graph of the structure of the terminological system.